.
Although
Ecocriticism are present in all areas of our society, for the purposes of this blog classification we are only interested in two types: those with 4x4 vehicles and those without.
Unfortunately, among those with 4x4 vehicles there are a number of characters, perhaps because it is fashionable to boast of "green" walk preaching virtues, attitudes and actions that bear no relation to reality. Tear their garments, and are to criticize and to maximize the actions of others that they qualify as minority. The trouble is that not only end up hurting them, but also harm those who use their vehicles to travel 4x4 to know new places in peace healthy.
On the other hand, are like going on a highway at 100 km / h, criticizing those who go to 80 for being too slow and hinder their passage, and going to 120 for being irresponsible fools. They are possessors of the truth and see themselves as great protectors of the environment, without taking into account that, for those who are more radical than they are few predators in high-powered machines that cause massive environmental damage by their mere existence . If they are so "green" Why not sell their rustic and use public transport instead?
These characters would do well to shut up and stop draw attention to a subject about which know only parroting what, and what they have seen on Discovery Channel and a few second page on the Internet.
Ecocriticism There are also, that not having a 4x4, they become bitter enemies in an activity not know and do not understand, angrily thrusting the red rag of the alleged environmental damage. Also called attention to the forms of communication derogatory and inaccurate, that appeal to resentment and hatred, when they talk about "Daddy's little children" or use the term "camionetotas", which only manages to convey the impression that after His words are motivations other than simple love of nature.
If we see it is impossible to pass through this world without causing any environmental damage. It is not possible to say that you love nature while despises his neighbor. What happens is that it is easier to see the mote in your neighbor's eye than the beam itself, and be swayed by passions of others to stop and think. occurs to me that we would do far more for the planet if everyone, each and every one of us did our part, instead of looking for another whom accountable.
Those of us love to travel in our 4x4 vehicles we also have our rights, which of course, carry their responsibilities and setting clear limits. But enough to let us trample by Ecocriticism, which apparently has nothing else to do, and which, moreover, often confuse the terms perhaps seeking their own advantage.
Equally unfortunate is the attitude of most media that shocking news of interest only, without taking the time to check that both can be true. Soil
be naive, but not enough to think that writing these lines can do to change the attitude Ecocriticism one. I just think that perhaps may make someone think a little here will be a bit of objectivity. By this I am satisfied.
meantime, suffer the consequences of the acts of one or the other .
http://tucanviajero.blogspot.com/
0 comments:
Post a Comment